*Trilateral Commission, gives rise to the need to create a global antiimperialist front

By Patrick Wood
Editor’s note: For ease of reading, all members of the 'A private organization founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Perpetual membership of around 300 covering Europe, Japan and the North America. Elite membership consists of corporate directors, scholars and high-ranking politicians of the Trilateral Commission appear in bold type.


“President Reagan ultimately came to understand Trilateral’s value and invited the entire membership to a reception at the White House in April 1984”— David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 20021.


According to each issue of the official Trilateral Commission quarterly magazine Trialogue: The Trilateral Commission was formed in 1973 by private citizens of Western Europe, Japan and North America to foster closer cooperation among these three regions on common problems. It seeks to improve public understanding of such problems, to support proposals for handling them jointly, and to nurture habits and practices of working together among these regions.”2

Further, Trialogue and other official writings made clear their stated goal of creating a “New International Economic Order.” President George H.W. Bush later talked openly about creating a “New World Order”, which has since become a synonymous phrase.

This paper attempts to tell the rest of the story, according to official and unofficial Commission sources and other available documents.


The Trilateral Commission was founded by the persistent maneuvering of David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Rockefeller was chairman of the ultra-powerful Chase Manhattan Bank, a director of many major multinational corporations and "endowment funds" and had long been a central figure in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Brzezinski, a brilliant prognosticator of one-world idealism, was a professor at Columbia University and the author of several books that have served as "policy guidelines" for the Trilateral Commission. Brzezinski served as the Commission's first executive director from its inception in 1973 until late 1976 when he was appointed by President Jimmy Carter as Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.


The initial Commission membership was approximately three hundred, with roughly one hundred each from Europe, Japan and North America. Membership was also roughly divided between academics, politicians and corporate magnates; these included international bankers, leaders of prominent labor unions and corporate directors of media giants.

The word commission was puzzling since it is usually associated with instrumentalities set up by governments. It seemed out of place with a so-called private group unless we could determine that it really was an arm of a government - an unseen government, different from the visible government in Washington. European and Japanese involvement indicated a world government rather than a national government. We hoped that the concept of a sub-rosa world government was just wishful thinking on the part of the Trilateral Commissioners. The facts, however, lined up quite pessimistically.


If the Council on Foreign Relations could be said to be a spawning ground for the concepts of one-world idealism, then the Trilateral Commission was the "task force" assembled to assault the beachheads. Already the Commission had placed its members in the top posts the U.S. had to offer.


President James Earl Carter, the country politician who promised, "I will never lie to you," was chosen to join the Commission by Brzezinski in 1973. It was Brzezinski, in fact, who first identified Carter as presidential timber, and subsequently educated him in economics, foreign policy, and the ins-and-outs of world politics. Upon Carter's election, Brzezinski was appointed assistant to the president for national security matters. Commonly, he was called the head of the National Security Council because he answered only to the president - some said Brzezinski held the second most powerful position in the U.S.


Carter's running mate, Walter Mondale, was also a member of the Commission. (If you are trying to calculate the odds of three virtually unknown men, out of over sixty Commissioners from the U.S., capturing the three most powerful positions in the land, don't bother. Your calculations will be meaningless.)


On January 7, 1977 Time Magazine, whose editor-in-chief, Hedley Donovan was a powerful Trilateral, named President Carter "Man of the Year." The sixteen-page article in that issue not only failed to mention Carter's connection with the Commission but also stated the following:
“As he searched for Cabinet appointees, Carter seemed at times hesitant and frustrated disconcertingly out of character. His lack of ties to Washington and the Party Establishment - qualities that helped raise him to the White House - carry potential dangers. He does not know the Federal Government or the pressures it creates. He does not really know the politicians whom he will need to help him run the country.”3


Is this portrait of Carter as a political innocent simply inaccurate or is it deliberately misleading? By December 25, 1976 - two weeks before the Time article appeared - Carter had already chosen his cabinet. Three of his cabinet members – Cyrus Vance, Michael Blumenthal, and Harold Brown - were Trilateral Commissioners; and the other non-Commission members were not unsympathetic to Commission objectives and operations.

In addition, Carter had appointed another fourteen Trilateral Commissioners to top government posts, including:
C. Fred Bergsten (Under Secretary of Treasury)
James Schlesinger (Secretary of Energy)
Elliot Richardson (Delegate to Law of the Sea)
Leonard Woodcock (Chief envoy to China)
Andrew Young (Ambassador to the United Nations)
As of 25 December 1976, therefore, there were nineteen Trilaterals, including Carter and Mondale, holding tremendous political power. These presidential appointees represented almost one-third of the Trilateral Commission members from the United States. The odds of that happening “by chance” are beyond calculation!


Nevertheless, was there even the slightest evidence to indicate anything other than collusion? Hardly! Zbigniew Brzezinski spelled out the qualifications of a 1976 presidential winner in 1973:
“The Democratic candidate in 1976 will have to emphasize work, the family, religion and, increasingly, patriotism...The new conservatism will clearly not go back to laissez faire. It will be a philosophical conservatism. It will be a kind of conservative statism or managerism. There will be conservative values but a reliance on a great deal of co-determination between state and the corporations.”4


On 23 May 1976 journalist Leslie H. Gelb wrote in the not-so-conservative New York Times, "(Brzezinski) was the first guy in the Community to pay attention to Carter, to take him seriously. He spent time with Carter, talked to him, sent him books and articles, educated him."5

Richard Gardner (also of Columbia University) joined into the "educational" task, and as Gelb noted, between the two of them they had Carter virtually to themselves. Gelb continued: "While the Community as a whole was looking elsewhere, to Senators Kennedy and Mondale...it paid off. Brzezinski, with Gardner, is now the leading man on Carter's foreign policy task force."6

Although Richard Gardner was of considerable academic influence, it should be clear that Brzezinski was the "guiding light" of foreign policy in the Carter administration. Along with Commissioner Vance and a host of other Commissioners in the State Department, Brzezinski had more than continued the policies of befriending our enemies and alienating our friends.



Since early 1977 we had witnessed a massive push to attain "normalized" relations with Communist China, Cuba, the USSR, Eastern European nations, Angola, etc. Conversely, we had withdrawn at least some support from Nationalist China, South Africa, Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia), etc. It was not just a trend - it was an epidemic. Thus, if it could be said that Brzezinski had, at least in part, contributed to current U.S. foreign and domestic policy, then we should briefly analyze exactly what he was espousing.


Needed: A More Just and Equitable World Order
The Trilateral Commission held their annual plenary meeting in Tokyo, Japan, in January 1977. Carter and Brzezinski obviously could not attend as they were still in the process of reorganizing the White House.



They did, however, address personal letters to the meeting, which were reprinted in Trialogue, the official magazine of the Commission:
“It gives me special pleasure to send greetings to all of you gathering for the Trilateral Commission meeting in Tokyo. I have warm memories of our meeting in Tokyo some eighteen months ago, and am sorry I cannot be with you now.
“My active service on the Commission since its inception in 1973 has been a splendid experience for me, and it provided me with excellent opportunities to come to know leaders in our three regions.
“As I emphasized in my campaign, a strong partnership among us is of the greatest importance. We share economic, political and security concerns that make it logical we should seek ever-increasing cooperation and understanding. And this cooperation is essential not only for our three regions, but in the global search for a more just and equitable world order (emphasis added). I hope to see you on the occasion of your next meeting in Washington, and I look forward to receiving reports on your work in Tokyo.
“Jimmy Carter”7


Brzezinski's letter, in a similar vein, follows:
“The Trilateral Commission has meant a great deal to me over the last few years. It has been the stimulus for intellectual creativity and a source of personal satisfaction. I have formed close ties with new friends and colleagues in all three regions, ties which I value highly and which I am sure will continue.
“I remain convinced that, on the larger architectural issues of today, collaboration among our regions is of the utmost necessity. This collaboration must be dedicated to the fashioning of a more just and equitable world order (emphasis added). This will require a prolonged process, but I think we can look forward with confidence and take some pride in the contribution which the Commission is making.
“Zbigniew Brzezinski”8


The key phrase in both letters was "more just and equitable world order." Did this emphasis indicate that something was wrong with our present world order, that is, with national structures?



Yes, according to Brzezinski, and since the present "framework" was inadequate to handle world problems, it must be done away with and supplanted with a world government.


In September 1974 Brzezinski was asked in an interview by the Brazilian newspaper Vega. "How would you define this new world order?" Brzezinski answered:
“When I speak of the present international system I am referring to relations in specific fields, most of all among the Atlantic countries; commercial, military, mutual security relations, involving the international monetary fund, NATO etc.



We need to change the international system for a global system in which new, active and creative forces recently developed - should be integrated. This system needs to include Japan. Brazil, the oil producing countries, and even the USSR, to the extent which the Soviet Union is willing to participate in a global system.”9


When asked if Congress would have an expanded or diminished role in the new system, Brzezinski declared "...the reality of our times is that a modern society such as the U.S. needs a central coordinating and renovating organ which cannot be made up of six hundred people."10


Brzezinski developed background for the need for a new system in his book Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era (1969). He wrote that mankind has moved through three great stages of evolution, and was in the middle of the fourth and final stage. (NOTE: by BASTA YA! USA..."the IV REICH).

The first stage he described as "religious," combining a heavenly "universalism provided by the acceptance of the idea that man's destiny is essentially in God's hands" with an earthly "narrowness derived from massive ignorance, illiteracy, and a vision confined to the immediate environment."

The second stage was nationalism, stressing Christian equality before the law, which "marked another giant step in the progressive redefinition of man's nature and place in our world." The third stage was Marxism, which, said Brzezinski, "represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man's universal vision." The fourth and final stage was Brzezinski's Technetronic Era, or the ideal of rational humanism on a global scale - the result of American-Communist evolutionary transformations.11

In considering our structure of governance, Brzezinski stated:
“Tension is unavoidable as man strives to assimilate the new into the framework of the old. For a time the established framework resiliently integrates the new by adapting it in a more familiar shape. But at some point the old framework becomes overloaded. The newer input can no longer be redefined into traditional forms, and eventually it asserts itself with compelling force. Today, though, the old framework of international politics - with their spheres of influence, military alliances between nation-states, the fiction of , doctrinal conflicts arising from nineteenth century crises - is clearly no longer compatible with reality.”12

One of the most important "
“The approaching two-hundredth anniversary of the Declaration of Independence could justify the call for a national constitutional convention to reexamine the nation's formal institutional framework. Either 1976 or 1989 - the two- hundredth an anniversary of the Constitution - could serve as a suitable target date culminating a national dialogue on the relevance of existing arrangements... Realism, however, forces us to recognize that the necessary political innovation will not come from direct constitutional reform, desirable as that would be. The needed change is more likely to develop incrementally and less overtly...in keeping with the American tradition of blurring distinctions between public and private institution.”13

In Brzezinski's Technetronic Era then, the "nation-state as a fundamental unit of man's organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state."14

Brzezinski’s philosophy clearly pointed forward to Richard Gardner’s Hard Road to World Order that appeared in Foreign Affairs in 1974, where Gardner stated,
"In short, the 'house of world order' would have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”15

That former approach which had produced few successes during the 1950’s and 1960’s was being traded for a velvet sledge-hammer: It would make little noise, but would still drive the spikes of globalization deep into the hearts of many different countries around the world, including the United States. Indeed, the Trilateral Commission was the chosen vehicle that finally got the necessary traction to actually create their New World Order.

Understanding the philosophy of the Trilateral Commission was and is the only way we can reconcile the myriad of apparent contradictions in the information filtered through to us in the national press. For instance, how was it that the Marxist regime in Angola derived the great bulk of its foreign exchange from the offshore oil operations of Gulf Oil Corporation? Why did Andrew Young insist that "Communism has never been a threat to Blacks in Africa"? Why did the U.S. funnel billions in technological aid to the Soviet Union and Communist China? Why did the U.S. apparently help its enemies while chastising its friends?

A similar and perplexing question is asked by millions of Americans today: Why do we spend trillions on the “War on Terror” around the world and yet ignore the Mexican/U.S. border and the tens of thousands of illegal aliens who freely enter the U.S. each and every month?

These questions, and hundreds of others like them, cannot be explained in any other way: the U.S. Executive Branch (and related agencies) was not anti-Marxist or anti-Communist - it was and is, in fact, pro- Marxist. Those ideals which led to the heinous abuses of Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, and Mussolini were now being accepted as necessary inevitabilities by our elected and appointed leaders.

This hardly suggests the Great American Dream. It is very doubtful that Americans would agree with Brzezinski or the Trilateral Commission. It is the American public who is paying the price, suffering the consequences, but not understanding the true nature of the situation.
This nature however, was not unknown or unknowable. Senator Barry Goldwater (R-AZ) issued a clear and precise warning in his 1979 book, With No Apologies:

“The Trilateral Commission is international and is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power – political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical.”16

Unfortunately, few heard and even fewer understood.

Follow the Money, Follow the Power
What was the economic nature of the driving force within the Trilateral Commission? It was the giant multinational corporations - those with Trilateral representation - which consistently benefited from Trilateral policy and actions. Polished academics such as Brzezinski, Gardner, Allison, McCracken, Henry Owen etc., served only to give "philosophical" justification to the exploitation of the world.

Don't underestimate their power or the distance they had already come by 1976. Their economic base was already established. Giants like Coca-Cola, IBM, CBS, Caterpillar Tractor, Bank of America, Chase Manhattan Bank, Deere & Company, Exxon, and others virtually dwarf whatever remains of American businesses. The market value of IBM's stock alone, for instance, was greater than the value of all the stocks on the American Stock Exchange. Chase Manhattan Bank had some fifty thousand branches or correspondent banks throughout the world. What reached our eyes and ears was highly regulated by CBS, the New York Times, Time magazine, etc.

The most important thing of all is to remember that the political coup de grace preceded the economic coup de grace. The domination of the Executive Branch of the U.S. government provided all the necessary political leverage needed to skew U.S. and global economic policies to their own benefit.

By 1977, the Trilateral Commission had notably become expert at using crises (and creating them in some instances) to manage countries toward the New World Order; yet, they found menacing backlashes from those very crises.

In the end, the biggest crisis of all was that of the American way of life. Americans never counted on such powerful and influential groups working against the Constitution and freedom, either inadvertently or purposefully, and even now, the principles that helped to build this great country are all but reduced to the sound of meaningless babblings.

Trilateral Entrenchment: 1980-2007
From left: Peter Sutherland, Sadako Ogata, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Paul Volcker, David Rockefeller. (25th Anniversary, New York, Dec. 1, 1998. Source: Trilateral Commission)It would have been damaging enough if the Trilateral domination of the Carter administration was merely a one-time anomaly; but it was not!

Subsequent presidential elections brought George H.W. Bush (under Reagan), William Jefferson Clinton, Albert Gore and Richard Cheney (under G. W. Bush) to power.

Thus, every Administration since Carter has had top-level Trilateral Commission representation through the President or Vice-president, or both!

It is important to note that Trilateral domination has transcended political parties: they dominated both the Republican and Democrat parties with equal aplomb.

In addition, the Administration before Carter was very friendly and useful to Trilateral doctrine as well: President Gerald Ford took the reins after President Richard Nixon resigned, and then appointed Nelson Rockefeller as his Vice President. Neither Ford nor Rockefeller were members of the Trilateral Commission, but Nelson was David Rockefeller’s brother and that says enough. According to Nelson Rockefeller’s memoirs, he originally introduced then-governor Jimmy Carter to David and Brzezinski.

How has the Trilateral Commission effected their goal of creating a New World Order or a New International Economic Order? They seated their own members at the top of the institutions of global trade, global banking and foreign policy.

For instance, is one of the most critical mechanisms in the engine of globalization.17 Since the founding of the Trilateral Commission in 1973, there have been only seven World Bank presidents, all of whom were appointed by the President.

Of these seven, six were pulled from the ranks of the Trilateral Commission!
Robert McNamara (1968-1981)
A.W. Clausen (1981-1986)
Barber Conable (1986-1991)
Lewis Preston (1991-1995)
James Wolfenson (1995-2005)
Paul Wolfowitz (2005-2007)
Robert Zoellick (2007-present)

Another good evidence of domination is the position of U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), which is critically involved in negotiating the many international trade treaties and agreements that have been necessary to create the New International Economic Order. Since 1977, there have been ten USTR’s appointed by the President. Eight have been members of the Trilateral Commission!
Robert S. Strauss (1977-1979)
Reubin O'D. Askew (1979-1981)
William E. Brock III (1981-1985)
Clayton K. Yeutter (1985-1989)
Carla A. Hills (1989-1993)
Mickey Kantor (1993-1997)
Charlene Barshefsky (1997-2001)
Robert Zoellick (2001-2005)
Rob Portman (2005-2006)
Susan Schwab (2006-present)

This is not to say that Clayton Yeuter and Rob Portman were not friendly to Trilateral goals, because they clearly were.

The Secretary of State cabinet position has seen its share of Trilaterals as well: Henry Kissinger (Nixon, Ford), Cyrus Vance (Carter), Alexander Haig (Reagan), George Shultz (Reagan), Lawrence Eagleburger (G.H.W. Bush), Warren Christopher (Clinton) and Madeleine Albright (Clinton) There were some Acting Secretaries of State that are also noteworthy: Philip Habib (Carter), Michael Armacost (G.H.W. Bush), Arnold Kantor (Clinton), Richard Cooper (Clinton).

Lastly, it should be noted that the Federal Reserve has likewise been dominated by Trilaterals: Arthur Burns (1970-1978), Paul Volker (1979-1987), Alan Greenspan (1987-2006). While the Federal Reserve is a privately-owned corporation, the President “chooses” the Chairman to a perpetual appointment. The current Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, is not a member of the Trilateral Commission, but he clearly is following the same globalist policies as his predecessors.

The point raised here is that Trilateral domination over the U.S. Executive Branch has not only continued and but has been strengthened from 1976 to the present. The pattern has been deliberate and persistent: Appoint members of the Trilateral Commission to critical positions of power so that they can carry out Trilateral policies.

The question is and has always been, do these policies originate in consensus meetings of the Trilateral Commission where two-thirds of the members are not U.S. citizens? The answer is all too obvious.

Trilateral-friendly defenders attempt to sweep criticism aside by suggesting that membership in the Trilateral Commission is incidental, and that it only demonstrates the otherwise high quality of appointees. Are we to believe that in a country of 300 million people only these 100 or so are qualified to hold such critical positions? Again, the answer is all too obvious.

Where Does the Council on Foreign Relations Fit?
While virtually all Trilateral Commission members from North America have also been members of the CFR, the reverse is certainly not true. It is easy to over-criticize the CFR because most of its members seem to fill the balance of government positions not already filled by Trilaterals.

The power structure of the Council is seen in the makeup of its board of directors: No less than 44 percent (12 out of 27) are members of the Commission! If director participation reflected only the general membership of the CFR, then only 3-4 percent of the board would be Trilaterals.18

Further, the president of the CFR is Richard N. Haass, a very prominent Trilateral member who also served as Director of Policy Planning for the U.S. Department of State from 2001-2003. Trilateral influence can easily be seen in policy papers produced by the CFR in support of Trilateral goals.

For instance, the 2005 CFR task force report on the Future of North America was perhaps the major Trilateral policy statement on the intended creation of the North American Union. Vice-chair of the task force was Dr. Robert A. Pastor, who has emerged as the “Father of the North American Union” and has been directly involved in Trilateral operations since the 1970’s. While the CFR claimed that the task force was “independent,” careful inspection of those appointed reveal that three Trilaterals were carefully chosen to oversee the Trilateral position, one each from Mexico, Canada and the United States: Luis Rubio, Wendy K. Dobson and Carla A. Hills, respectively.19 Hills has been widely hailed as the principal architect of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) that was negotiated under President George H.W. Bush in 1992
.
The bottom line is that the Council on Foreign Relations, thoroughly dominated by Trilaterals, serves the interests of the Trilateral Commission, not the other way around!

Trilateral Globalization in Europe
The content of this paper thus far suggests ties between the Trilateral Commission and the United States. This is not intended to mean that Trilaterals are not active in other countries as well. Recalling the early years of the Commission, David Rockefeller wrote in 1998,
“Back in the early Seventies, the hope for a more united EUROPE was already full-blown – thanks in many ways to the individual energies previously spent by so many of the Trilateral Commission’s earliest members.” [Capitals in original]20

Thus, since 1973 and in parallel with their U.S. Hegemony, the European members of the Trilateral Commission were busy creating the European Union. In fact, the EU's Constitution was authored by Commission member Valéry Giscard d'Estaing in 2002-2003, when he was President of the Convention on the Future of Europe. [For more on the EU, see European Union: Dictatorship Rising? and The Globalization Strategy: America and Europe in the Crucible]

The steps that led to the creation of the European Union are unsurprisingly similar to the steps being taken to create the North American Union today. As with the EU, lies, deceit and confusion are the principal tools used to keep an unsuspecting citizenry in the dark while they forge ahead without mandate, accountability or oversight. [See The Globalization Strategy: America and Europe in the Crucible and Toward a North American Union]

Conclusion
It is clear that the Executive Branch of the U.S. was literally hijacked in 1976 by members of the Trilateral Commission, upon the election of President Jimmy Carter and Vice-President Walter Mondale. This near-absolute domination, especially in the areas of trade, banking, economics and foreign policy, has continued unchallenged and unabated to the present.
Windfall profits have accrued to interests associated with the Trilateral Commission, but the effect of their “New International Economic Order” on the U.S. has been nothing less than devastating. (See America Plundered by the Global Elite for a more detailed analysis)
The philosophical underpinnings of the Trilateral Commission are pro-Marxist and pro-socialist. They are solidly set against the concept of the nation-state and in particular, the Constitution of the United States. Thus, national sovereignty must be diminished and then abolished altogether in order to make way for the New World Order that will be governed by an unelected global elite with their self-created legal framework.
If you are having negative sentiment against Trilateral-style globalization, you are not alone. A 2007 Financial Times/Harris poll revealed that less than 20 percent of people in six industrialized countries (including the U.S.) believe that globalization is good for their country while over 50 percent are outright negative towards it.21 (See Global Backlash Against Globalization?) While citizens around the world are feeling the pain of globalization, few understand why it is happening and hence, they have no effective strategy to counter it.
The American public has never, ever conceived that such forces would align themselves so successfully against freedom and Liberty. Yet, the evidence is clear: Steerage of America has long since fallen into the hands of an actively hostile enemy that intends to remove all vestiges of the very things that made us the greatest nation in the history of mankind.

Endnotes
Rockefeller, David, Memoirs (Random House, 2002), p.418
Trialogue, Trilateral Commission (1973)
Time Magazine, Jimmy Carter: Man of the Year, January 7, 1977
Sutton & Wood, Trilaterals Over Washington (1979), p. 7
New York Times, Jimmy Carter, Leslie Gelb, May 23, 1976
ibid.
Trialogue, Looking Back…And Forward, Trilateral Commission, 1976
ibid.
Sutton & Wood, Trilaterals Over Washington (1979), p. 4
ibid. p. 5
Brzezinski, Zbigniew, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era (New York: Viking Press, 1973), p. 246.
ibid.
ibid.
ibid.
Gardner, Richard, The Hard Road to World Order, (Foreign Affairs, 1974) p. 558
Goldwater, Barry, With No Apologies, (Morrow, 1979), p. 280
Global Banking: The World Bank, Patrick Wood, The August Review
Board of Directors, Council on Foreign Relations website
Building a North American Community, Council on Foreign Relations, 2005
Rockefeller, David, In the Beginning…” The Trilateral Commission at 25, 1998, p.11
FT/Harris poll on Globalization, FT.com website

*Part II, The Truth About the Federal Reserve Private Corporation, not limited to Fraud, Conspiracy, Unlawful Conversion, Treason

"The Fed are spending $100,000,000 a week buying government
securities in the open market and are making a great bid for foreign
business.

They are trying to make rates so attractive that the human hair
merchants and the distillers and other business entities in foreign land will
come her and hire more of the public credit of the United States
Government to pay the Fed outfit for getting it for them.

World Enslavement Planned
"Mr. Chairman, when the Fed was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world system was being set up here which
would make the savings of the American school teacher available to a
narcotic-drug vendor in Acapulco. They did not perceive that these United
States was to be lowered to the position of a coolie country which has
nothing but raw material and heart, that Russia was destined to supply the
man power and that this country was to supply the financial power to an
"international superstate".

A superstate controlled by international bankers,
and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure? "The people of these United States are being greatly wronged.

They have been driven from their employment's. They have been dispossessed from
their homes. They have been evicted from their rented quarters. They have
lost their children. They have been left to suffer and die for lack of shelter,
food, clothing and medicine.

"The wealth of these United States and the working capital have been
taken away from them and has either been locked in the vaults of certain
banks and the great corporations or exported to foreign countries for the
benefit of the foreign customers of these banks and corporations. So far as
the people of the United States are concerned, the cupboard is bare.
"It is true that the warehouses and coal yards and grain elevators are full,
but these are padlocked, and the great banks and corporations hold the keys.

"The sack of these United States by the Fed is the greatest crime in history.


"Mr. Chairman, a serious situation confronts the House of Representatives
today. We are trustees of the people and the rights of the people are being
taken away from them. Through the Fed the people are losing the rights
guaranteed to them by the Constitution. Their property has been taken from
them without due process of law.

Mr. Chairman, common decency requires us to examine the public accounts of the Government and see what crimes against the public welfare (and against humanity) have been committed.


"What is needed here is a return to the Constitution of these United States.

"The old struggle that was fought out here in Jackson's time must be fought our over again. The independent United States Treasury should be reestablished and the Government should keep its own money under lock and key in the building the people provided for that purpose.


"Asset currency, the devise of the swindler, should be done away with.

The Fed should be abolished and the State boundaries should be respected.

Bank reserves should be kept within the boundaries of the States whose
people own them, and this reserve money of the people should be
protected so that the International Bankers and acceptance bankers and
discount dealers cannot draw it away from them.


"The Fed should be repealed, and the Fed Banks, having violated their
charters, should be liquidated immediately. Faithless Government officials
who have violated their oaths of office should be impeached and brought to
trial.

"Unless this is done by us, I predict, that the American people, outraged,
pillaged, insulted and betrayed as they are in their own land, will rise in their wrath, and will sweep the money changers out of the temple.


"Mr. Chairman, the United States is bankrupt: It has been bankrupted by
the corrupt and dishonest Fed.

It has repudiated its debts to its own citizens. Its chief foreign creditor is Great Britain, and a British bailiff has been at the White House and the British Agents are in the United States Treasury making inventory arranging terms of liquidations!
Great Britain, Partner in Blackmail

"Mr. Chairman, the Fed has offered to collect the British claims in full from
the American public by trickery and corruption, if Great Britain will help to
conceal its crimes. The British are shielding their agents, the Fed, because
they do not wish that system of robbery to be destroyed here. They wish it
to continue for their benefit! By means of it, Great Britain has become the
financial mistress of the world. She has regained the position she occupied
before the World War.

"For several years (Britain) has been a silent partner in the business of the Fed.
Under threat of blackmail, or by their bribery, or by their native treachery to
the people of the United States, the officials in charge of the Fed unwisely
gave Great Britain immense gold loans running into hundreds of millions of
dollars. They did this against the law! Those gold loans were not single
transactions. They gave Great Britain a borrowing power in the United
States of billions. She squeezed billions out of this Country by means of her
control of the Fed.

"As soon as the Hoover Moratorium was announced, Great Britain moved
to consolidate her gains. After the treacherous signing away of American
rights at the 7-power conference at London in July, 1931, which put the Fed
under the control of the Bank of International Settlements, Great Britain
began to tighten the hangman's noose around the neck of the United
States.

"She (Great Britain) abandoned the gold standard and embarked on a campaign of buying up the claims of foreigners against the Fed in all parts of the world.

She has now sent her bailiff, Ramsey MacDonald, here to get her war debt to this country canceled. But she has a club in her hands! She has title to the gambling debts which the corrupt and dishonest Fed incurred abroad.

"Ramsey MacDonald, the labor party deserter, has come here to compel the President to sign on the dotted line, and that is what Roosevelt is about
to do! Roosevelt will endeavor to conceal the nature of his action from the
American people. But he will obey the International Bankers and transfer
the war debt that Great Britain should pay to the American people, to the
shoulders of the American taxpayers.


"Mr. Chairman, the bank holiday in the several States was brought about by
the corrupt and dishonest Fed. These institutions manipulated money and
credit, and caused the States to order bank holidays.
"These holidays were frame-ups! "They were dress rehearsals for the
national bank holiday which Franklin D. Roosevelt promised Sir Ramsey
MacDonald that he would declare.


"There was no national emergency here when Franklin D. Roosevelt took
office excepting the bankruptcy of the Fed- a bankruptcy which has been going on under cover for several years and which has been concealed from the people so that the people would continue to permit their bank deposits and their bank reserves and their gold and the funds of the United States
Treasury to be impounded in these bankrupt institutions.


"Under cover, the predatory International Bankers have been stealthily
transferring the burden of the Fed debts to the people's Treasury and to the
people themselves.

They the farms and the homes of the United States to
pay for their thievery!

That is the only national emergency that there has been here since the depression began.


"The week before the bank holiday was declared in New York State, the
deposits in the New York savings banks were greater than the withdrawals.
There were no runs on New York Banks. There was no need of a bank holiday in New York, or of a national holiday.

Roosevelt and the International Bankers

"Roosevelt did what the International Bankers ordered him to do!

"Do not deceive yourself, Mr. Chairman, or permit yourself to be deceived
by others into the belief that Roosevelt's dictatorship is in any way intended to benefit the people of the United States: he is preparing to sign on the
dotted line! "He is preparing to cancel the war debts by fraud!

"He is preparing to internationalize this Country and to destroy our
Constitution itself in order to keep the Fed intact as a money institution for
foreigners.

"Mr. Chairman, I see no reason why citizens of the United States should be
terrorized into surrendering their property to the International Bankers who own and control the Fed.

The statement that gold would be taken from its lawful owners if they did not voluntarily surrender it, to private interests, show that there is an anarchist in our Government.

"The statement that it is necessary for the people to give their gold- the only real money- to the banks in order to protect the currency, is a statement of calculated dishonesty!

"By his unlawful usurpation of power on the night of March 5, 1933, and by
his proclamation, which in my opinion was in violation of the Constitution of
the United States, Roosevelt divorced the currency of the United States
from gold, and the United States currency is no longer protected by gold. It
is therefore sheer dishonesty to say that the people's gold is needed to
protect the currency.

"Roosevelt ordered the people to give their gold to private interests- that is, to banks, and he took control of the banks so that all the gold and gold
values in them, or given into them, might be handed over to the predatory
International Bankers who own and control the Fed.

"Roosevelt cast his lot with the usurers.

"He (Roosevelt) agreed to save the corrupt and dishonest at the expense of the people of the United States.

"He took advantage of the people's confusion and weariness and spread the dragnet over the United States to capture everything of value that was left in it. He made a great haul for the International Bankers.

"The Prime Minister of England came here for money! He came here to
collect cash!

"He came here with Fed Currency and other claims against the Fed which
England had bought up in all parts of the world. And he has presented them
for redemption in gold.


"Mr. Chairman, I am in favor of compelling the Fed to pay their own debts. I
see no reason why the general public should be forced to pay the gambling
debts of the International Bankers.


Roosevelt Seizes the Gold
"By his action in closing the banks of the United States, Roosevelt seized
the gold value of forty billions or more of bank deposits in the United States
banks. Those deposits were deposits of gold values. By his action he has
rendered them payable to the depositors in paper only, if payable at all,
and the paper money he proposes to pay out to bank depositors and to the
people generally in lieu of their hard earned gold values in itself, and being
based on nothing into which the people can convert it the said paper
money is of negligible value altogether.

"It is the money of slaves, not of free men.

If the people of the United States permit it to be imposed upon them at the will of their credit masters, the next step in their downward progress will be their acceptance of orders on company stores for what they eat and wear. Their case will be similar to that of starving coal miners. They, too, will be paid with orders on Company stores for food and clothing, both of indifferent quality and be forced to live in Company-owned houses from which they may be evicted at the drop of a
hat. More of them will be forced into conscript labor camps under
supervision.

"At noon on the 4th of March, 1933, FDR with his hand on the Bible, took
an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the U.S. At
midnight on the 5th of March, 1933, he confiscated the property of
American citizens. He took the currency of the United States standard of
value. He repudiated the internal debt of the Government to its own
citizens. He destroyed the value of the American dollar. He released, or
endeavored to release, the Fed from their contractual liability to redeem
Fed currency in gold or lawful money on a parity with gold. He depreciated
the value of the national currency.


"The people of the U.S. are now using unredeemable paper slips for
money.

The U.S. Treasury cannot redeem that paper in gold or silver.

The gold and silver of the Treasury has unlawfully been given to the corrupt and
dishonest Fed.

And the Administration has since had the effrontery to raid
the country for more gold for the private interests by telling our patriotic
citizens that their gold is needed to protect the currency.

"It is not being used to protect the currency! It is being used to protect the
corrupt and dishonest Fed.

"The directors of these institutions have committed criminal offense against the United States Government, including the offense of making false entries on their books, and the still more serious offense of unlawfully abstracting funds from the United States Treasury!

"Roosevelt's gold raid is intended to help them out of the pit they
dug for themselves when they gambled away the wealth and savings of the
American people.


Dictatorship
"The International Bankers set up a dictatorship here because they wanted
a dictator who would protect them. They wanted a dictator who would
protect them. They wanted a dictator who would issue a proclamation
giving the Fed an absolute and unconditional release from their special
currency in gold, or lawful money of any Fed Bank.


"Has Roosevelt relieved any other class of debtors in this country from the
necessity of paying their debts?

Has he made a proclamation telling the farmers that they need not pay their mortgages? Has he made a proclamation to the effect that mothers of starving children need not pay their milk bills? Has he made a proclamation relieving householders from the necessity of paying rent?


Roosevelt's Two Kinds of Laws
"Not he! He has issued one kind of proclamation only, and that is a
proclamation to relieve international bankers and the foreign debtors of the
United States Government.


"Mr. Chairman, the gold in the banks of this country belongs to the
American people who have paper money contracts for it in the form of
national currency. If the Fed cannot keep their contracts with United States
citizens to redeem their paper money in gold, or lawful money, then the Fed
must be taken over by the United States Government and their officers
must be put on trial.

"There must be a day of reckoning.

If the Fed have looted the Treasury so that the Treasury cannot redeem the United States currency for which it is liable in gold, then the Fed must be driven out of the Treasury.

"Mr. Chairman, a gold certificate is a warehouse receipt for gold in the Treasury, and the man who has a gold certificate is the actual owner of a
corresponding amount of gold stacked in the Treasury subject to his order.


"Now comes Roosevelt who seeks to render the money of the United
States worthless by unlawfully declaring that it may No Longer be converted
into gold at the will of the holder.

"Roosevelt's next haul for the International Bankers was
the reduction in the pay of all Federal employees.

"Next in order are the veterans of all wars, many of whom are aged and
infirm, and other sick and disabled. These men had their lives adjusted for
them by acts of Congress determining the amounts of the pensions, and,
while it is meant that every citizen should sacrifice himself for the good of
the United States, I see no reason why those poor people, these aged Civil
War Veterans and war widows and half-starved veterans of the World War,
should be compelled to give up their pensions for the financial benefit of
the International vultures who have looted the Treasury, bankrupted the
country and traitorously delivered the United States to a foreign foe.


"There are many ways of raising revenue that are better than that barbaric act of injustice.

"Why not collect from the Fed the amount they owe the U.S. Treasury in
interest on all the Fed currency they have taken from the Government?

That would put billions of dollars into the U.S. Treasury.
"If FDR is as honest as he pretends to be, he will have that done
immediately. And in addition, why not compel the Fed to disclose their
profits and to pay the Government its share?


"Until this is done, it is rank dishonesty to talk of maintaining the credit of
the U.S. Government. "My own salary as a member of Congress has been
reduced, and while I am willing to give my part of it that has been taken
away from me to the U.S. Government, I regret that the U.S. has suffered
itself to be brought so low by the vultures and crooks who are operating the
roulette wheels and faro tables in the Fed, that is now obliged to throw itself
on the mercy of its legislators and charwomen, its clerks, and it poor
pensioners and to take money out of our pockets to make good the
defalcations of the International Bankers who were placed in control of the
Treasury and given the monopoly of U.S. Currency by the misbegotten Fed.


"I am well aware that the International Bankers who drive up to the door of
the United States Treasury in their limousines, look down with scorn upon
members of Congress because we work for so little, while they draw
millions a year. The difference is that we earn, or try to earn, what we get-
and they steal the greater part of their takings.

Enemies of the People They Rob
"I do not like to see vivisection's performed on human beings. I do not like
to see the American people used for experimental purposes by the credit
masters of the United States. They predicted among themselves that they
would be able to produce a condition here in which American citizens
would be completely humbled and left starving and penniless in the streets.


"The fact that they made that assertion while they were fomenting their
conspiracy against the United States that they like to see a human being,
especially an American, stumbling from hunger when he walks.

"Something should be done about it, they say. Five-cent meals, or something!

"But,FDR will not permit the House of Representatives to investigate the
condition of the Fed. FDR will not do that. He has certain International
Bankers to serve. They look to him as the man Higher Up who will
protect them from the just wrath of an outraged people.


"The International Bankers have always hated our pensioners. A man with
a small pension is a ward of the Government. He is not dependent upon
them for a salary or wages. They cannot control him. They do not like him. It gave them great pleasure, therefore, to slash the veterans.

"But FDR will never do anything to embarrass his financial supporters. He
will cover up the crimes of the Fed.

"Before he was elected, Mr. Roosevelt advocated a return to the earlier
practices of the Fed, thus admitting its corruptness. The Democratic
platform advocated a change in the personnel of the Fed. These were
campaign bait.

As a prominent Democrat lately remarked to me; "There is no new deal. The same old crowd is in control."


"The claims of foreign creditors of the Fed have no validity in law.

The foreign creditors were the receivers- and the willing receivers- of stolen goods! They have received through their banking fences immense
amounts of currency, and that currency was unlawfully taken from the United
States Treasury by the Fed.


"England discovered the irregularities of the Fed quite early in its
operations and through fear, apparently, the Fed have for years suffered themselves to be blackmailed and dragooning England to share in the business of the Fed.

"The Fed have unlawfully taken many millions of dollars of the public credit of the United States and have given it to foreign sellers on the security of the Debt paper of foreign buyers in purely foreign transactions, and when the foreign buyers refused to meet their obligations
and the Fed saw no honest way of getting the stolen goods back into their
possession, they decided by control of the executive to make the American
people pay their losses!

Conspiracy of War Debts
"They likewise entered into a conspiracy to deprive the people of the U.S.
of their title to the war debts and not being able to do that in the way they
intended, they are now engaged in an effort to debase the American dollar
so that foreign governments will have their debts to this country cut in two,
and then by means of other vicious underhanded arrangements, they
propose to remit the remainder.


"So far as the U.S. is concerned, the gambling counters have no legal standing.

The U.S. Treasury cannot be compelled to make good the gambling ventures of the corrupt and dishonest Fed.

Still less should the bank deposits of the U.S. be used for that purpose.

Still less should the national currency have been made irredeemable in gold so that the gold which was massed and stored to redeem the currency for American citizens may be used to pay the gambling debts of the Fed for England's benefit.

"The American people should have their gold in their own possession where it cannot be held under secret agreement for any foreign control bank, or world bank, or oreign nation. Our own citizens have the prior claim to it. The paper [money men] have in their possession deserves
redemption far more than U.S. currency and credit which was stolen from
the U.S. Treasury and bootlegged abroad.


"Why should the foreigners be made preferred creditors of the bankrupt
U.S.? Why should the U.S. be treated as bankrupt at all?

This Government has immense sums due it from the Fed. The directors of these institutions are men of great wealth. Why should the guilty escape the consequences
of their misdeeds? Why should the people of these U.S. surrender the
value of their gold bank deposits to pay off the gambling debts of these
bankers? Why should Roosevelt promise foreigners that the U.S. will play
the part of a good neighbor, 'meeting its obligations'?


"Let the Fed meet their own obligations.
"Every member of the Fed should be compelled to disgorge, and every
acceptance banker and every discount corporation which has made illegal
profits by means of public credit unlawfully bootlegged out of the U.S.
Treasury and hired out by the crooks and vultures of the Fed should be
compelled to disgorge.

Federal Reserve Pays No Taxes
"Gambling debts due to foreign receivers of stolen goods should not be
paid by sacrificing our title to our war debts, the assets of the U.S.
Treasury- which belong to all the people of the U.S. and which it is our duty
to preserve inviolate in the people's treasury.

"The U.S. Treasury cannot be made liable for them.

The Fed currency must be redeemed by the Fed banks or else these Fed banks must be liquidated.

"We know from assertions made here by the Hon. John N. Garner,
Vice-President of the U.S. that there is a condition in the [United States
such] would cause American citizens, if they knew what it was, to lose all
confidence in their government.

"That is a condition that Roosevelt will not have investigated. He has brought with him from Wall Street, James Warburg, the son of Paul M.Warburg. Mr. Warburg, alien born, and the son of an alien who did not become naturalized here until several years after this Warburg's birth, is a son of a former partner of Kuhn, Loeb and Co., a grandson of another partner, a nephew of a former partner, and a nephew of a present partner.

"He holds no office in our Government, but I am told that he is in daily
attendance at the Treasury, and that he has private quarters there! In other
words, Mr. Chairman, Kuhn, Loeb and Company now has control and occupy the U.S. Treasury.

Preferred Treatment for Foreigners
"The text of the Executive order which seems to place an embargo on
shipments of gold permits the Secretary of the Treasury, a former director
of the corrupt, to issue licenses at his discretion for the export of gold coin,
or bullion, earmarked or held in trust for a recognized foreign government
or foreign central bank for international settlement.

Now, Mr. Chairman, if gold held in trust for those foreign institutions may be sent to them, I see no reason why gold held in trust for American as evidenced by their gold certificates and other currency issued by the U.S. Government should not
be paid to them.

"I think that American citizens should be entitled to treatment at least as good as that which the person is extending to foreign governments, foreign central banks, and the bank of International Settlements. I think a veteran of the world war, with a $20.00 gold certificate, is at least as much entitled to receive his own gold for it, as any international banker in the city of New York or London.

"By the terms of this executive order, gold may be exported if it is actually required, for the fulfillment of any contract entered into prior to the date of this order by an applicant who, in obedience to the executive order of April
5, 1933, has delivered gold coin, gold bullion, or gold certificates. "This
means that gold may be exported to pay the obligations abroad of the Fed
which were incurred prior to the date of the order, namely, April 20, 1933.
"If a European Bank should send 100,000,000 dollars in Fed currency to a
bank in this country for redemption, that bank could easily ship gold to
Europe in exchange for that currency. Such Fed currency would represent
"contracts" entered into prior to the date of the order. If the Bank of
International Settlements or any other foreign bank holding any of the
present gambling debt paper of the Fed should draw a draft for the settlement of such obligation, gold would be shipped to them because the debt contract would have been entered into prior to the date of order.


Crimes and Criminals
"Mr. Speaker, I rise to a question of constitutional privilege.
"Whereas, I charge. . .Eugene Meyer, Roy A. Young, Edmund Platt,
Eugene B. Black, Adolph Casper Miller, Charles S. Hamlin, George R.
James, Andrew W. Mellon, Ogden L. Mills, William H. Woo W. Poole,
J.F.T. O'Connor, members of the Federal Reserve Board; F. H. Curtis, J.H.
Chane, R.L. Austin, George De Camp, L.B. Williams, W.W. Hoxton, Oscar
Newton, E.M. Stevens, J.S. Wood, J.N. Payton, M.L. McClure, C.C. Walsh,
Isaac B. Newton, Federal Reserve Agents, jointly and severally, with
violations of the Constitution and laws of the United States, and whereas I
charge them with having taken funds from the U.S Treasury which were not
appropriated by the Congress of the United States, and I charge them with
having unlawfully taken over $80,000,000,000 from the U.S. Government in
the year 1928, the said unlawful taking consisting of the unlawful creation of
claims against the U.S. Treasury to the extent of over $80,000,000,000 in
the year 1928; and I charge them with similar thefts committed in 1929,
1930, 1931, 1932 and 1933, and in years previous to 1928, amounting to
billions of dollars; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally with having unlawfully created
claims against the U.S. Treasury by unlawfully placing U.S. Government
credit in specific amounts to the credit of foreign governments and foreign
central banks of issue; private interests and commercial and private banks
of the U.S. and foreign countries, and branches of foreign banks doing
business in the U.S., to the extent of billions of dollars; and with having
made unlawful contracts in the name of the U.S. Government and the U.S.
Treasury; and with having made false entries on books of account; and
"Whereas I charge them jointly and severally, with having taken Fed Notes
from the U.S. Treasury and with having put Fed Notes into circulation
without obeying the mandatory provision of the Fed Act which requires the
Fed Board to fix an interest rate on all issues of Fed Notes supplied to Fed
Banks, the interest resulting therefrom to be paid by the Fed Banks to the
government of the U.S. for the use of the Fed Notes, and I charge them of
having defrauded the U.S. Government and the people of the U.S. of
billions of dollars by the commission of this crime, and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having purchased U.S.
Government securities with U.S. Government credit unlawfully taken and
with having sold the said U.S. Government securities back to the people of
the U.S. for gold or gold values and with having again purchased U.S.
Government securities with U.S. Government credit unlawfully taken and
with having again sold the said U.S. Government security for gold or gold
values, and I charge them with having defrauded the U.S. Government and
the people of the U.S. by this rotary process; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having unlawfully
negotiated U.S. Government securities, upon which the Government
liability was extinguished, as collateral security for Fed Notes and with
having substituted such securities for gold which was being held as
collateral security for Fed Notes, and with having by the process defrauded
the U.S. Government and the people of the U.S., and I charge them with the
theft of all the gold and currency they obtained by this process; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having unlawfully issued
Fed currency on false, worthless and fictitious acceptances and other
circulating evidence of debt, and with having made unlawful advances of
Fed currency, and with having unlawfully permitted renewals of
acceptances and renewals of other circulating evidences of debt, and with
having permitted acceptance bankers and discount dealer corporations
and other private bankers to violate the banking laws of the U.S.; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having conspired to
have evidences of debt to the extent of $1,000,000,000 artificially created
at the end of February, 1933, and early in March 1933, and with having
made unlawful issues and advances of Fed currency on the security of said
artificially created evidences of debt for a sinister purpose, and with having
assisted in the execution of said sinister purpose; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having brought about the
repudiation of the currency obligations of the Fed Banks to the people of
the U.S. and with having conspired to obtain a release for the Fed Board
and the Fed Banks from their contractual liability to redeem all Fed
currency in gold or lawful money at the Fed Bank and with having
defrauded the holders of Fed currency, and with having conspired to have
the debts and losses of the Fed Board and the Fed Banks unlawfully
transferred to the Government and the people of the U.S., and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having unlawfully
substituted Fed currency and other irredeemable paper currency for gold in
the hands of the people after the decision to repudiate the Fed currency
and the national currency was made known to them, and with thus having
obtained money under false pretenses; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having brought about a
repudiation of the notes of the U.S. in order that the gold value of the said
currency might be given to private interests, foreign governments, foreign
central banks of issues, and the Bank of International Settlements, and the
people of the U.S. to be left without gold or lawful money and with no
currency other that a paper currency irredeemable in gold, and I charge
them with having done this for the benefit of private interests, foreign
governments, foreign central banks of issue, and the bank of International
Settlements; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with conniving with the Edge
Law banks, and other Edge Law institutions, accepting banks, and
discount corporations, foreign central banks of issue, foreign commercial
banks, foreign corporations, and foreign individuals with funds unlawfully
taken from the U.S. Treasury; and I charge them with having unlawfully
permitted and made possible 'new financing' for foreigners at the expense
of the U.S. Treasury to the extent of billions of dollars and with having
unlawfully permitted and made possible the bringing into the United States
of immense quantities of foreign securities, created in foreign countries for
export to the U.S. and with having unlawfully permitted the said foreign
securities to be imported into the U.S. instead of gold, which was lawfully
due to the U.S. on trade balances and otherwise, and with having lawfully
permitted and facilitated the sale of the said foreign securities in the U.S.,
and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having unlawfully
exported U.S. coins and currency for a sinister purpose, and with having
deprived the people of the U.S. of their lawful medium of exchange, and I
charge them with having arbitrarily and unlawfully reduced the amount of
money and currency in circulation in the U.S. to the lowest rate per capita in
the history of the Government, so that the great mass of the people have
been left without a sufficient medium of exchange, and I charge them with
concealment and evasion in refusing to make known the amount of U.S.
money in coins and paper currency exported and the amount remaining in
the U.S. as a result of which refusal the Congress of the U.S. is unable to
ascertain where the U.S. coins and issues of currency are at the present
time, and what amount of U.S. currency is now held abroad; (M1,M2,M3 2007)and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having arbitrarily and
unlawfully raised and lowered the rates of money and with having arbitrarily
increased and diminished the volume of currency in circulation for the
benefit of private interests at the expense of the Government and the
people of the U.S. and with having unlawfully manipulated money rates,
wages, salaries and property values both real and personal, in the U.S. by
unlawful operations in the open discount market and by resale and
repurchase agreements unsanctioned by law, and
"Whereas I charge them jointly and severally, with having brought about the
decline in prices on the New York Stock Exchange and other exchanges in
October, 1929, by unlawful manipulation of money rates and the volume of
U.S. money and currency in circulation: by theft of funds from the U.S.
Treasury by gambling in acceptances and U.S. Government securities; by
service rendered to foreign and domestic speculators and politicians, and
by unlawful sale of U.S. gold reserves abroad, and

"Whereas the unconstitutional inflation law imbedded in the so-called Farm
Relief Act by which the Fed Banks are given permission to buy U.S.
Government securities to the extent of $3,000,000,000 and to draw forth
currency from the people's Treasury to the extent of $3,000,000,000 is
likely to result in connivance on the part of said accused with others in the
purchase by the Fed of the U.S. Government securities to the extent of
$3,000,000,000 with U.S. Government's own credit unlawfully taken, it
being obvious that the Fed do no not intend to pay anything of value to the
U.S. Government for the said U.S. Government securities no provision for
payment in gold or lawful money appearing in the so-called Farm Relief bill-
and the U.S. Government will thus be placed in a position of conferring a
gift of $3,000,000,000 in the U.S. Government securities on the Fed to
enable them to pay more on their bad debts to foreign governments,
foreign central banks of issue, private interests, and private and
commercial banks, both foreign and domestic, and the Bank of
International Settlements, and
"Whereas the U.S. Government will thus go into debt to the extent of
$3,000,000,000 and will then have an additional claim of $3,000,000,000
in currency unlawfully created against it and whereas no private interest
should be permitted to buy U.S. Government securities with the
Government's own credit unlawfully taken and whereas currency should not
be issued for the benefit of said private interest or any interests on U.S.
Government securities so acquired, and whereas it has been publicly
stated and not denied that the inflation amendment of the Farm Relief Act
is the matter of benefit which was secured by Ramsey MacDonald, the
Prime Minister of Great Britain, upon the occasion of his latest visit to the
U.S. Treasury, and whereas there is grave danger that the accused will
employ the provision creating U.S. Government securities to the extent of
$3,000,000,000 and three millions in currency to be issuable thereupon for
the benefit of themselves and their foreign principals, and that they will
convert the currency so obtained to the uses of Great Britain by secret
arrangements with the Bank of England of which they are the agents, and
for which they maintain an account and perform services at the expense of
the U.S. Treasury, and that they will likewise confer benefits upon the Bank
of International Settlements for which they maintain an account and perform
services at the expense of the U.S. Treasury; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having concealed the
insolvency of the Fed and with having failed to report the insolvency of the
Fed to the Congress and with having conspired to have the said insolvent
institutions continue in operation, and with having permitted the said
insolvent institutions to receive U.S. Government funds and other deposits,
and with having permitted them to exercise control over the gold reserves
of the U.S. and with having permitted them to transfer upward of
$100,000,000,000 of their debts and losses to the general public and the
Government of the U.S., and with having permitted foreign debts of the Fed
to be paid with the property, the savings, the wages, and the salaries of the
people of the U.S. and with the farms and the homes of the American
people, and whereas I charge them with forcing the bad debts of the Fed
upon the general public covertly and dishonestly and and with taking the
general wealth and savings of the people of the U.S. under false pretenses,
to pay the debts of the Fed to foreigners; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with violations of the Fed Act
and other laws; with maladministration of the h evasions of the Fed Law
and other laws; and with having unlawfully failed to report violations of law
on the part of the Fed Banks which, if known, would have caused the Fed
Banks to lose their charters, and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with failure to protect and
maintain the gold reserves and the gold stock and gold coinage of the U.S.
and with having sold the gold reserves of the U.S to foreign Governments,
foreign central banks of issue, foreign commercial and private banks, and
other foreign institutions and individuals at a profit to themselves, and I
charge them with having sold gold reserves of the U.S. so that between
1924 and 1928 the U.S. gained no gold on net account but suffered a
decline in its percentage of central gold reserves from the 45.9 percent in
1924 to 37.5 percent in 1928 notwithstanding the fact that the U.S. had a
favorable balance of trade throughout that period, and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having conspired to
concentrate U.S. Government securities and thus the national debt of the
U.S. in the hands of foreigners and international money lenders and with
having conspired to transfer to foreigners and international money lenders
title to and control of the financial resources of the U.S.; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having fictitiously paid
installments on the national debt with Government credit unlawfully taken;
and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with the loss of the U.S.
Government funds entrusted to their care; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having destroyed
independent banks in the U.S. and with having thereby caused losses
amounting to billions of dollars to the said banks, and to the general public
of the U.S., and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with the failure to furnish true
reports of the business operations and the true conditions of the Fed to the
Congress and the people, and having furnished false and misleading
reports to the congress of the U.S., and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having published false
and misleading propaganda intended to deceive the American people and
to cause the U.S. to lose its independence; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with unlawfully allowing Great
Britain to share in the profits of the Fed at the expense of the Government
and the people of the U.S.; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having entered into
secret agreements and illegal transactions with Montague Norman,
Governor of the Bank of England; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with swindling the U.S.
Treasury and the people of the U.S. in pretending to have received
payment from Great Britain of the amount due on the British ware debt to
the U.S. in December, 1932; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having conspired with
their foreign principals and others to defraud the U.S. Government and to
prevent the people of the U.S. from receiving payment of the war debts due
to the U.S. from foreign nations; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with having robbed the U.S
Government and the people of the U.S. by their theft and sale of the gold
reserves of the U.S. and other unlawful transactions created a deficit in the
U.S. Treasury, which has necessitated to a large extent the destruction of
our national defense and the reduction of the U.S. Army and the U.S. Navy
and other branches of the national defense; and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, of having reduced the U.S.
from a first class power to one that is dependent, and with having reduced
the U.S. from a rich and powerful nation to one that is internationally poor;
and
"Whereas I charge them, jointly and severally, with the crime of having
treasonable conspired and acted against the peace and security of the
U.S. and with having treasonable conspired to destroy constitutional
Government in the U.S.


"Resolve, That the Committee on the Judiciary is authorized and directed
as a whole or by subcommittee, to investigate the official conduct of the
Fed agents to determine whether, in the opinion of the said committee,
they have been guilty of any high crime or misdemeanor which in the
contemplation the Constitution requires the interposition of the
Constitutional powers of the House. Such Committee shall report its finding
to the House, together with such resolution or resolutions of impeachment
or other recommendations as it deems proper.
"For the purpose of this resolution the Committee is authorized to sit and
act during the present Congress at such times and places in the District of
Columbia or elsewhere, whether or not the House is sitting, has recessed
or has adjourned, to hold such clerical, stenographic, and other assistants,
to require of such witnesses and the production of such books, papers, and
documents, to take such testimony, to have such printing and binding done,
and to make such expenditures as it deems necessary."
After some discussion and upon the motion of Mr. Byrns, the resolution and
charge was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

"Attacks on McFadden's Life Reported"
Commenting on Former Congressman Louis T. McFaddens's
"heart-failure sudden-death" on Oct. 3, 1936, after a "dose" of "intestinal
flu," "Pelley's Weekly" of Oct. 14 said:
 
Now that this sterling American patriot has made the Passing, it
can be revealed that not long after his public utterance against
the encroaching powers of Judah, it became known among his
intimates that he had suffered two attacks against his life.

The first attack came in the form of two revolver shots fired at him
from ambush as he was alighting from a cab in front of one of
the Capital hotels. Fortunately both shots missed him, the
bullets burying themselves in the structure of the cab.


"He became violently ill after partaking of food at a political
banquet at Washington. His life was only saved from what was
subsequently announced as a poisoning by the presence of a
physician friend at the banquet, who at once procured a stomach
pump and subjected the Congressman to emergency treatment." /s/
Robert Edward Edmondson (Publicist-Economist)
 
President Andrew Jackson stated in reference to
the bankers at the state of his administration: "You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out."

FINISH
1)the vast ramifications of this gigantic private credit monopoly
2)concerning banking and currency affairs